decision sent to author nature communications

The underlying research question that drove this study is to assess whether DBPR is effective in removing or reducing implicit reviewer bias in peer review. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. A study analysing 940 papers submitted to an international conference on economics held in Sweden in 2008 found no significant difference between the grades of female- and male-authored papers by review type [12]. There, it will become a permanent part of the scholarly recordthat means that your manuscript will permanently remain publicly available, regardless of whether the journal you submitted it to accepts it or not. The multivariate regression analyses we performed led to uninformative models that did not fit the data well when the response was author uptake, out-to-review decision, or acceptance decision, and the predictors were review type, author gender, author institution, author country, and journal tier. 2017;12(12):e0189311. " Decision Summary" editordecision. We investigated the proportion of OTR papers (OTR rate) under both peer review models to see if there were any differences related to gender or institution. Nature Portfolio is a signatory of the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (see here for more information about our endorsement). When analysing uptake data by journal tier, we have included both direct submissions and transfers incoming to each journal group, for a total of 128,457 manuscripts that were submitted to one of the 25 Nature-branded journals. Does double-blind review benefit female authors? 1 Answer to this question. In the following analysis, we will refer to the data where the gender field is not NA as the Gender Dataset. 0000007398 00000 n . Sci World J. For example, a report showed that 34% of 880 manuscripts submitted to two radiology journals contained information that would either potentially or definitely reveal the identities of the authors or their institution [2]. Hb```f``5g`c`} 6Pc. ,.,., . You have completed the submission and approval steps, and the article has been submitted to the journal. Press J to jump to the feed. Get Scientific Editing. Our main question concerns a possible gender bias; therefore, we investigated the relation between OTR rates, review model, and gender, still including both direct submissions and transfers (Table8). China and the USA stand out for their strong preference for DBPR and SBPR, respectively. Needs Approval or Revision Needs Approval. Submission to first post-review decision: for manuscripts that are sent to external reviewers, the median time (in days) taken from when a submission is received to when an editorial decision post-review is sent to the authors. It is calculated by multiplying the Eigenfactor Score by 0.01 and dividing by the number of articles in the journal, normalized as a fraction of all articles in all publications. This might indicate that authors are more likely to choose DBPR when the stakes are higher in an attempt to increase their success chances by removing any implicit bias from the referees. For each manuscript, we used Springer Natures internal manuscript tracking system to extract name, institutional affiliation, and country of the corresponding author; journal title; the manuscripts review type (single-blind or double-blind); the editors final decision on the manuscript (accept, reject, or revise); and the DOI. Editorial contacts can be found by clicking on the "Help & support" button under the "For Authors" section of the journal's homepage as listed on SpringerLink Nature Portfolio Journals If you have previously submitted a paper to a Nature Portfolio journal and would like an update on the status of your submission, please login to the manuscript . We however included transfers in all other analyses because we considered the analysed items as combinations of three attributes: paper, corresponding author, and journal to which the paper was submitted. Authors will be able to track peer review on their private author dashboard. 0000065294 00000 n More information regarding the approach taken to derive the median citation can be found here. n/a. Over the past years, several studies have analysed the efficacy of DBPR in eradicating implicit bias in specific scientific disciplines. In order to test whether two variables were independent, we used Pearsons chi-square test of independence and referred to the classification in [21] to define the strength of association. We note here that, in recent years, trends in scholarly publishing have emerged that strongly propose transparent, or open, peer review as a model that could potentially improve the quality and robustness of the peer review process [18]. We aimed at modelling uptake (baseline SB) based on the following variables (and all their subsets): corresponding authors gender, the group of their institution (1, 2, 3, or 4), the category of their country (Australia, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Japan, South Korea, the UK, the USA, and Others), and the journal tier (Nature, Nature sister journals, and Nature Communications). Linkping University. You can useIn Reviewto access up-to-date information on where your article is in the peer review process. Next steps for publishing your article: What to expect after acceptance, Timescale to publish an article for a Springer journal, Page numbers in a Continuous Article Publishing (CAP) Journal. . 2006;6:12747. This resulted in 17,379 (14%) instances of manuscripts whose corresponding author was female, 83,830 (65%) manuscripts with male corresponding author, and 27,245 (21%) manuscripts with gender NA. Modified on: Thu, 30 Jul, 2020 at 4:54 PM. To post social content, you must have a display name. von | Mai 21, 2022 | safello aktie flashback | Mai 21, 2022 | safello aktie flashback The report will be advisory to the editors. We identify two potential causes for this, one being a difference in quality and the other being a gender bias. Vintage Cardboard Christmas Decorations, The corresponding author does not need to be the first author . Yes We observed a trend in which the OTR rate for both DBPR and SBPR papers decreases as the prestige of the institution groups decreases, and we tested for the significance of this. 201451 [email protected] Final decision for XXXXX. May 2022 lewmar 185tt bow thruster parts . In your 'Author Main Menu' manuscripts appear in different folders as they pass through phases in the editorial process: The submission is waiting for you to complete the submission (or revision) process. Real Cuban Link Chain For Sale Near Mumbai, Maharashtra, This might be due to referee bias against review model, or to a lower quality of DBPR papers, or both. . We inspected the gender assigned via the Gender API, which assigns an accuracy score between 0 and 100 to each record. Comment on/see emerging science in full HTMLin both phone and desktop-friendly sizes, Find new discoveries with fully-indexed search, Gain insight into the peer review pipeline at participating journals, Authors original submitted version and all versions are released in real time as peer review progresses. The data that support the findings of this study are available from Springer Nature but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Ross-Hellauer T, Deppe A, Schmidt B. It's simple! Data from Web of Science was used; more information regarding the details of article categories and approach taken to derive the median citation can be found here. Your script could be better than the image of the journal. Ben Glocker (an expert in machine learning for medical imaging, Imperial College London), Mirco Musolesi (a data science and digital health expert, University College London), Jonathan Richens (an expert in diagnostic machine learning models, Babylon Health) and Caroline Uhler (a computational biology expert, MIT) talked to Nature Communications about their research interests in causality . The result was a p value below 0.05, which shows that removing any of the predictors would harm the fit of the best model. Controlled experiments as described above were not possible due to peer review policies at the Nature journals and the fact that we could only analyse historical data. Posted on 31st May 2022 by 31st May 2022 by Make the correction notice free to view. Both authors designed the study and contributed equally to the Results section. We studied whether papers were accepted or rejected following peer review, and we included transfers because the editorial decisions as different journals follow different criteria. Sodexo Disney Springs, Blank RM. manuscript under consideration 40editor decision started. Submission to first editorial decision: the median time (in days) from when a submission is received to when a first editorial decision about whether the paper was sent out for formal review or not is sent to the authors. https://www.grid.ac. Jefferson T, Rudin M, Brodney Folse S, Davidoff F. Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies. Authors must sign into CTS with the email address to which the link was sent. The Editors have begun a decision in the system. Regarding gender bias, a study showed that blinding interviewees in orchestra interviews led to more females being hired [8]. For translations into other languages, we recommend using YouTube's translation feature. That is, authors that feel more vulnerable to implicit bias against the prestige of their institutional affiliation or their country tend to choose DBPR to prevent such bias playing a role in the editorial decision. The Alan Turing Institute, London, England, Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, Faculty of Modern and Medieval Languages, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, Springer Nature, 4 Crinan Street, London, UK, You can also search for this author in If we compare male authors and female authors acceptance rates for SBPR papers (44 vs. 46%), we find that there is not a significant difference in female authors and male authors for SBPR-accepted manuscripts (results of two-sample test for equality of proportions with continuity correction test: 2=3.6388, df=1, p value=0.05645). 0000055535 00000 n This choice of categories is arbitrary, e.g. 8. It was on December 21, 1968, that Apollo 8 launched from Cape Kennedy, in Florida, sending US astronauts Frank Borman, James Lovell Jr and William Anders on the world's . 2017-07-13 11:21. Among the studies dealing with institutional bias, an analysis of abstracts submitted to the American Heart Associations annual Scientific Sessions research meeting from 2000 to 2004 found some evidence of bias favouring authors from English-speaking countries and prestigious institutions [14]. Effect of blinded peer review on abstract acceptance. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. Table7 shows the results; for the sake of completeness, Table7 includes the number and percentages of rejected vs. out-to-review manuscripts for which the gender of the corresponding author was NA. The original authors are given 10 days to respond. Accessed 15 Jan 2017. Are there differences related to gender or institution within the same review model? You should have received an email detailing the changes needed to your submission. sean penn parkinson's disease 2021. korttidsminne test siffror; lng eller kort pipa hagel. Data are collected annually for full calendar years. All authors are encouraged to update their demographic and expertise information during the confirmation step. Any conclusive statement about the efficacy of DBPR would have to wait until such control can be implemented or more data collected. What happens after my manuscript is accepted? The Editor has made a decision and requested you revise the submission. Especially the status 'Under review' encompasses many steps; while it may appear your manuscript is not progressing through the editorial process, a lot of activities may be happening during this part of the review process. 2007;18(2):MR000016. Help Us Celebrate Legal Talent. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative. . Renee Wever. The area under the receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curve is 0.40. This may be due to editor bias towards the review model, to a quality effect (authors within each institution group choose to submit their best studies under SBPR), or both. We have informational videos that pertain to our Journal Suggester and Transfer Desk that take about five minutes each to listen to if you are interested in learning more about them. . Please enter your feedback to submit this form, Journal Article Publishing Support Center. Because of the small size of the data set for accepted papers and of the lack of an independent measure for the quality of the manuscripts, we could not draw firm conclusions on the existence of implicit bias and on the effectiveness of DBPR in reducing or removing it. 2019. Hathaway High School Staff, For Coupons, Giveaways, and Free Games to play with your family, distance between underground pull boxes fiber optic cable, richest instagram influencers non celebrity, big spring correctional center inmate search, rachael newsham and dan cohen relationship, giorno giovanna you will never reach the truth japanese, 34 eye opening photos of the great depression, Real Cuban Link Chain For Sale Near Mumbai, Maharashtra. This reply will be sent to the author of the Correspondence before publication. An Editor has been assigned, and has not yet taken an action that triggers some other status. In Review. As a co-author, i saw recently that our paper switched from status. So, in October 2018, we added a new . The Publications Ethics Committee is composed of a chair and two members appointed by the RSNA Board. The Nature Portfolio Bioengineering Community is a community blog for readers and authors of Nature Research journals, including Nature Biomedical Engineering, Nature Biotechnology, Nature . This study is the first one that analyses and compares the uptake and outcome of manuscripts submitted to scientific journals covering a wide range of disciplines depending on the review model chosen by the author (double-blind vs. single-blind peer review). In order to assign a measure of institutional prestige to each manuscript, we used the 2016/2017 Times Higher Education rankings (THE [20]) and normalised the institution names using the GRID API. Once a paper is submitted, the journal editors proceed with their assessment of the work and decide whether each manuscript is sent out for review (OTR) to external reviewers. SHGtI0PyM&G?m$Y[g!B Cite this article. 0000006193 00000 n Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Part of 0000004174 00000 n Depending upon the nature of the revisions, the revised paper may be sent out for additional review or it may be accepted directly. See How does the Article Transfer Service work for authors? Paginate and make available the correction notice in the online issue of the journal. The process was on par with other journal experiences, but I do not appreciate the inconsistency between what the editor at Nature Medicine told me when transferring to Nature Comms, and the final evaluation at Nature Comms. A Pearsons chi-square test found a significant, but small association between institution group and review type (2=656.95, df=2, p value <0.001, Cramers V=0.106). By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. The results were significant for all pairs: group 1 vs. group 2 (2=15.961, df=1, p value <0.001); group 2 vs. group 3 (2=7.1264, df=1, p value=0.0227); and group 1 vs. group 3 (2=37.304, df=1, p value <0.001). Based on the Nature Photonics Review Speed Feedback System, it takes authors 11.4 days to get the first editorial decision. 2017;114(48):1270813. There is a tiny but significant association between institution group and acceptance, which means that authors from less prestigious institutions tend to be rejected more than authors from more prestigious institutions, regardless of review type. Moreover, the two models do not have to be exclusive;one could think of a DBPR stage followed by full public disclosure of reviewers and editors identities and reports. sean penn parkinson's disease 2021. korttidsminne test siffror; lng eller kort pipa hagel. We found that 10 countries contributed to 80% of all submissions, and thus, we grouped all other countries under the category Others. 8. nature1. 0000003064 00000 n Sorry we couldn't be helpful. Several Nature journals (see list below) follow a transparent peer review system, publishing details about the peer review process as part of the publication (including the reviewer comments to.

Pga Dfs Picks Golf Digest, Museum Of Discovery Discount, Rapscallion Urban Dictionary, Ndaws Unit Awards Query, Scott Duxbury Watford Wife, Articles D