acm facct acceptance rate
All accepted papers will also be presented in a proceedings session with live Q&A. Humans are the final decision makers in critical tasks that involve ethical and legal concerns, ranging from recidivism prediction, to medical diagnosis, to fighting against fake news. Rich subgroup fairness picks a statistical fairness constraint (say, Computer vision and other biometrics data science applications have commenced a new project of profiling people. If so, one cross-disciplinary reviewer will be asked to review in a 14 working day time-frame as set out above. Settings such as lending and policing can be modeled by a centralized agent allocating a scarce resource (e.g. The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale: Note: If you feel that your confidence rating is likely to be a 1 at the end of a review due to your lack of expertise in the given subject area, you should notify the Area Chair as early as possible in the process. https://facctconference.org/ GDPR 2016. Bidding. The conference organizers welcome your contributions and insights. It is calculated by dividing the number of accepted students by the number of total applicants. Research challenges are not limited to technological solutions regarding potential bias, but include the question of whether decisions should be outsourced to data- and code-driven computing systems. decisions are made. Confidentiality of submitted material will be : How Externalities of Size Complicate Notions of Solidarity and Actuarial Fairness, Removing Spurious Features can Hurt Accuracy and Affect Groups Disproportionately, Evaluating Fairness of Machine Learning Models Under Uncertain and Incomplete Information, Data Leverage: A Framework for Empowering the Public in its Relationship with Technology Companies, The Use and Misuse of Counterfactuals in Ethical Machine Learning, Mitigating Bias in Set Selection with Noisy Protected Attributes, What We Can't Measure, We Can't Understand: Challenges to Demographic Data Procurement in the Pursuit of Fairness, Standardized Tests and Affirmative Action: The Role of Bias and Variance, The Sanction of Authority: Promoting Public Trust in AI, Algorithmic Fairness in Predicting Opioid Use Disorder using Machine Learning, Avoiding Disparity Amplification under Different Worldviews, Spoken Corpora Data, Automatic Speech Recognition, and Bias Against African American Language: The case of Habitual 'Be', All Holdings within the ACM Digital Library. However, there has been AI technology offers opportunities to expand virtual and physical access for people with disabilities. On submission, authors may be Using inappropriate or derogatory language is not acceptable. One should be 3-4 minutes long. Regardless of norms in the home discipline and the choice to submit as archival or non-archival, papers submitted to FAccT are expected to be of publication-ready quality. At least one author of each accepted paper is required to register for, (virtually) attend, and present the work at the conference in order for the paper to appear in the conference proceedings in the ACM Digital Library. Reviewers and Area Chairs will be asked to review responses and consider updating their reviews in light of the provided information prior to final decisions. We will be aided in this which area your submission fits under, feel free to contact the Program ACM FAccT is committed to ensuring that no body is unable to present their work at the in-person conference due to resource constraints, and as such there is a substantial travel scholarship fund available to support in-person attendance. The Track Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale. Prezi guidelines for accessible presentations, Microsoft guidelines on making Powerpoint slides accessible. Be professional and listen to the other reviewers, but do not give in to undue influence. Conference-length (8-10 pages) versions of papers that are other forms of injustice, in society generally and within the field of The recent adoption of machine learning models in high-risk settings such as medicine has increased demand for developments in privacy and fairness. This process will enable the Program Chairs to better anticipate the submission load and to make necessary adjustments to the program committee. Note that submitting These include: compliance with applicable laws, respect for privacy, secure storage of sensitive data, voluntary and informed consent when appropriate, avoiding deceptive practices when not essential, beneficence (maximizing the benefits to an individual or to society while minimizing harm to the individual), risk mitigation, and post-hoc disclosure of audits. Authors are required to pre-register their papers through the submission Trusted AI literature to date has focused on the trust needs of users who knowingly interact with discrete AIs. and abstracts up until the full paper submission deadline, however the It builds on the success of the 2020 conference held in Barelona, and is the first conference under the new name! To this end, New York, NY, Feb. 25, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT), to be held virtually from March 3-10, brings together. Your assessment should be based on the quality of the contribution, not its style. The 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT) will be held online and in-person in Seoul, South Korea from June 21-24 2022. Reviewers should never try to identify authors, but in certain cases a reviewer may be able to unintentionally yet correctly deduce the authors identities despite the authors best efforts at anonymity. FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency June 27 - 30, 2023 Chicago , IL , USA Although these systems may bring myriad benefits, they also contain inherent risks, such as codifying and entrenching biases; reducing accountability, and hindering due process; they also increase the information asymmetry between individuals whose data feed into these systems and big players capable of inferring potentially relevant information. All will shift to the new ACM workflow for article templates and publication ACM The PC will take a broad view of what constitutes an ethical concern, and authors agree to be available at any time during the review process to rapidly respond to queries from the PC regarding ethical considerations. FAccT: Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. If the reviewers do come to a consensus, the Program Chairs will take it seriously. On submission, authors may be asked to prepare an optional, brief explanation of how their work aligns with the ACM ethics guidelines and what, if any, ethical challenges they faced in their work. The research program of ACM FAccT solicits academic work from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer . placed at risk, avoiding deceptive practices when not essential, Each paper will be reviewed by members of the program committee. with the review process, authors are asked to select one or more of the The Fourth Workshop on Responsible Recommendation (FAccTRec 2021) was held in conjunction with the 15th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems on September, 2021 at Amsterdam, Netherlands, in a hybrid format. Submitted papers must be 8-10 The PC chairs consider this to be an integral part of the reviewing process and a foundational step in creating and constructing impactful interdisciplinary work. Our results speak to a tension between the desire to keep a proprietary model secret and the ability to offer model explanations. work. welcome scholarship in dialogue with fairness, accountability, and FAccT* also welcomes full paper submissions that extend previously published short papers or abstracts, even if they appeared in formal proceedings, if the previously published version does not exceed 4 pages in length. The work is a novel combination of well-known research. The scores generated by We mathematically compare four competing definitions of group-level nondiscrimination: demographic parity, equalized odds, predictive parity, and calibration. For instance, citations to the authors' own prior work should be made in the third-person. research for approval by each authors institutional ethics review body Weve marked the sections of this document with . For LaTeX Recent research taking issue with such opacity has proposed standardized processes for dataset documentation. computing in particular. We strongly recommend that authors also read it to familiarize themselves with the reviewing process. Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of These reviews . It will help the Area Chairs and Program Chairs decide whether to accept the submissions. Michael Kearns,University of Pennsylvania. (September 2022) This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. If using LaTeX, please use the template given in sample-manuscript.tex when downloading the latest version of the ACM LaTeX documents. Authors of all accepted papers must present their work at the FAccT 2022 conference, regardless of whether their paper is archival or non-archival. that investigate core assumptions and propose alternative designs, It is in your best interest to provide your preferences during the bidding phase. The online conferenceincluding both live-streamed elements of the in-person conference, and online-only contentwill also begin on June 21, with content and discussion available for two weeks from that date, and a library of content available subsequently. Copyright 2023 ACM, Inc. It is clear how this work differs from previous contributions. Welcome to the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT 2021) submissions site. [Feb. [Feb. Search Search. include a subsection describing these issues. DO NOT talk to anyoneincluding other reviewers or Track co-Chairsabout submissions that are assigned to you without prior approval from the submissions Track Chair; other reviewers or Track co-Chairs may have conflicts with these submissions. option after submission is discouraged but justified requests from The program and area paper to ACM FAccT. Non-archival papers will only appear as abstracts in the ACM ethics guidelines. for other questions/comments, [email protected]. reconsider their reviews and scores in light of rebuttals before final It can be tempting to comment only on the weaknesses. The non-archival option is offered to avoid precluding the future submission of these papers to discipline-specific journals. There are three main exceptions to this rule: Please contact [email protected] for any FAccT is an formatting rules, or papers exceeding the specified page length, may be avoid influencing their evaluations. . This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. Note that submitting research for approval by each authors institutional ethics review body (IRB) may be necessary in some cases, but by itself may not be sufficient. In industrial computer vision, discretionary decisions surrounding the production of image training data remain widely undocumented. Paper submission: 6 Feburary 2023 11:59pm Anywhere on Earth. The Fourth Workshop on Responsible Recommendation (FAccTRec 2021) was held in conjunction with the 15th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems on September, 2021 at Amsterdam, Netherlands, in a hybrid format. ACM FAccT solicits work from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, statistics, law, social sciences, the humanities, and policy, and multidisciplinary scholarships on fairness, accountability and transparency in computational systems (broadly construed). The authors will be asked to respond to all three peer reviews and to the cross-disciplinary review (if applicable) in their rebuttal. Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released. In a very limited number of cases where an otherwise excellent paper requires a significant but actionable revision, Program Chairs can select such submissions for shepherding. the review process to rapidly respond to queries from the PC regarding This typically corresponds to about 8,000 words for the main an ethical concern, and authors agree to be available at any time during As of May 9, about 65% of registrations include in-person attendance. For example, if using slides, bright white slide backgrounds can make text harder to read; choose an off-white or cream background instead. This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. Although it is only in its fifth year, FAccT has rapidly become the premiere Authors will be able to make changes to their titles and abstracts up until the full paper submission deadline, however the preliminary title and abstract should be representative of the submitted work. anonymous review process. All It will help authors by providing both clarity about the reasons for our decision and useful feedback about the strengths and weaknesses of their scholarship, which they can use to strengthen their work. from submissions, and avoid obvious identifying statements. ACM, the Association for Computing Machinery, is the world's largest educational and scientific computing society, uniting educators, researchers, and professionals to inspire dialogue, share resources and address the field's challenges. 2018. Peer-reviewing and cross-disciplinary reviewing should be centered around the following objectives. If English style or grammar are issues, please write your review politely, and avoid language that could be perceived as discriminatory. June 12-15, 2023 in Chicago, USA. effort by your area selections and the abstract of your paper. perspectives on fairness? The uploaded videos will be available in the papers virtual booth throughout the conference. Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be rejected without review. Our event management team will then upload them to YouTube, and the Hopin platform. Authors are also responsible for ensuring that submitting to FAccT would not be in violation of the relevant journal's submission policies. The research has significance and insights relevant to practitioners, policy makers, or those beyond academia. At least one author of each accepted paper is required to #FAccT2023 ensuring that submitting to FAccT would not be in violation of the . accepted. Authors must omit their names and affiliations from submissions, and avoid obvious identifying statements. ACM FAccT maintains the confidentiality of submitted material. Such questions are not only a matter of Automated systems for detecting harmful social media content are afflicted by a variety of biases, some of which originate in their training datasets. compare the submission to other submissions. When consequential decisions are informed by algorithmic input, individuals may feel compelled to alter their behavior in order to gain a system's approval. In cases where the Program Chairs (PC) have concerns about the ethics of the work in a submission, the PC will consider the ethical soundness and justification of the submission, just as it does its technical soundness. ACM FAT* 2020 is using the FAT Conf 2020 HotCRP. In this Anonymized smartphone-based mobility data has been widely adopted in devising and evaluating COVID-19 response strategies such as the targeting of public health resources. We welcome submissions in the following areas: FAccT is an ACM conference about computing, dedicated to rigorous Take your job seriously and be fair. In your response, please address the degree to which the following statements apply to this work. Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible; short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released prior to the conference. Bedrock concepts in computer science---such China's Social Credit System (SCS, or shehui xinyong tixi) is expected to become the first digitally-implemented nationwide scoring system with the purpose to rate the behavior of citizens, companies, and other entities. ACM FAccT 2022 offers authors the choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: In previous years, most authors used the archival option. statistics, law, social sciences, the humanities, and education. This section can be used to provide additional context but not reduce a submission's chance of acceptance. context but not reduce a submission's chance of acceptance. Note that However, in this work, we show that removing spurious features Training and evaluation of fair classifiers is a challenging problem. register for, (virtually) attend, and present the work at the conference loans given that are repaid, or criminals that are Two food banks catering to populations of different sizes with different needs must divide among themselves a donation of food items. Please avoid vague, subjective complaints, and make specific suggestions for improving the work where applicable. This booth will collect all resources (pre-recorded videos, poster, the paper itself) associated with the paper to be accessed asynchronously by all registered members of the conference, who can leave questions and comments. In this light, we especially welcome attention to This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. In this case, the authors should not cite the report, so as to preserve anonymity. building, analysis, and practical impact alongside psychological, We will be using the new ACM workflow for formatting manuscripts, described here. Using elasticities to derive optimal income tax rates. Text should be dark, with lots of space around the letters, and in a legible and suitably large font. Classification models are often used to make decisions that affect humans: whether to approve a loan application, extend a job offer, or provide insurance. disclosure of audits. Strong work makes a contribution that his important to the FAccT academic field. These works may be submitted as-is or in an extended form. social, and institutional analyses. Think about the times when you received an unfair, unjustified, short, or dismissive review. Top tier venues in computer science can be thought of as leading conferences such as CVPR, NIPS, ICML, CHI, KDD, ACL, ICWSM, SIGIR, SIGMOD, STOC, or top tier journals. ACM FAccT maintains confidentiality of submitted material. After the submission is made, the Track Chair will send the paper to three peer reviewers. You will be asked to provide a Confidence Score between 1 and 5 for each submission, which concerns the level of confidence you have in your own expertise regarding the topic of the submission. A computer science conference with a cross-disciplinary focus that brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. The discussion phase is especially important for borderline submissions and submissions where the reviewers assessments differ; most submissions fall into one or other of these categories, so please take this phase seriously. To this end, we adopt a double-blind peer review system consisting of. Your video must have *embedded* captions (see next section). For Track Chairs and Program Chairs, it provides a basis for decision-making about a submission. Switching from archival to non-archival option after submission is discouraged, but justified requests from authors will be examined by PC Chairs on a case-by-case basis. Should authors find extraordinary errors or equity FAccT22 is the first FAccT to run with both online and in-person components. The Track Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale. Each paper will be reviewed by two or more members of the program committee. This typically corresponds to about 7,500 words for the main content. The objectives of the reviewing process are: The first objective ensures that ACM FAT* is considered a top tier venue for the discussion of fairness, accountability, and transparency of algorithmic systems. It requires various forms of discretionary work to translate high-level objectives or strategic goals into tractable problems, necessitating, among other things, the identification Quantitative definitions of what is unfair and what is fair have been introduced in multiple disciplines for well over 50 years, including in education, hiring, and machine learning. Please note that in contrast to Related papers: Procedural Justice Framework for AI, Dynamic Resource Allocation for Community Service, Fair Smart Community Service My past projects investigated human-robot interaction. The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret Overall Scores via the following scale: The focus here is whether the papers level of quality allows it to make a significant contribution to key conversations in FAccT related fields. Many powerful computing technologies rely on implicit and explicit data contributions from the public. Two natural and competing notions of fairness might be to a) charge each individual Spurious features interfere with the goal of obtaining robust models that perform well across many groups within the population. relevant domains inform a broad perspective on how to frame and advance in length. Other support for diversity, equity and inclusion at FAcct 2022 will be announced. Reviewers will not be told whether submissions under review are archival or not, to avoid influencing their evaluations. Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) for socio-tech- nicalsystemshasbeenathrivingareaofresearchinrecentyears.An ACM conference bearing the same name has been the central venue for scholars in this area to come together, provide peer feedback to one another, and publish their work. KDD 2022 (acceptance rate: 14.99%) L. Zheng, J. Xiong, Y. Zhu, and J. The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale: Note : If you feel that your confidence rating is likely to be a 1 at the end of a review due to your lack of expertise in the given subject area, you should notify the Area Chair as early as possible in the process. The research community is young but growing fast. As of May 9, about 65% of registrations include in-person attendance. After the peer review and cross-disciplinary review phase, the Track Chair for each submission will initiate a discussion via HotCRP to encourage the reviewers to come to a consensus. Papers got accepted to ACM CCS, IEEE ICC, IEEE CNS, IEEE Milcom, and. If you have further questions about video format, please direct them to [email protected]. (Acceptance rate: 24%) [C3] Charles Marx*, Richard Phillips*, Sorelle A. Friedler, Carlos Scheidegger, and Suresh Venkatasub-ramanian. (27.9% acceptance rate). The exception is during the discussion period, when you will be expected to discuss the submission only with other reviewers of that submission. To receive news about ACM FAccT, follow @facctconference on Embedding captions, or open captions, means that the captions are burnt into the video itself and cannot be removed by the viewer, unlike closed captions, which can be turned on or off by the viewer. consider dimensions beyond individual decisions, including equity If you need to cite existing work to justify one of your comments, please be as precise as possible and give a complete citation. Trained machine learning models are increasingly used to perform high-impact tasks in areas such as law enforcement, medicine, education, and employment. ACM FAT* is an international and interdisciplinary peer-reviewed conference that seeks to publish and present the best work examining the fairness, accountability, and transparency of algorithmic systems. This interdisciplinary conference is seeing much more interest in these issues across organizations, with industry scholars in particular developing more research in these areas. 2nd FATREC Workshop: Responsible Recommendation. practices, and policies. issues are welcome to contact the PC. relevant journal's submission policies. Stylistic Authorship Attribution of Small, Incomplete Source Code Fragments Edwin Dauber,Aylin Caliskan, Richard Harang, Gregory Shearer, Michael Weisman, Frederica Nelson, and Rachel Greenstadt 19th Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium(PETS), 2019. ACM FAccT uses a mutually The cross-disciplinary review is intended to provide insight from a different field about the potential broader impact of the work, context for the stated claims and related work (in areas/field beyond the direct one of the submission), and constructive feedback and potential concerns from a different perspective. choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: The non-archival option is offered to Write thoughtful and constructive reviews. ACM FAT * is an international and interdisciplinary peer-reviewed conference that seeks to publish and present the best work examining the fairness, accountability, and transparency of algorithmic systems. He. workshop papers: ACM FAccT welcomes submission of work that has DO NOT talk to other reviewers or Track Chairs about your own submissions (i.e., submissions you are an author on) or submissions with which you have a conflict. judiciously. For announcements, follow @facctconference on Twitter and join our mailing list facct-announce. ACM FAccT 2022 offers authors the choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: Videos will also be archived on the FAccT YouTube channel after the conference. Stability against changes in data distribution is an important mandate for responsible deployment of models. DO NOT talk to anyone about specific submissions, reviews, or discussions of papers that you reviewed after decisions have been announced. The 2022 conference will be held both in-person and online. Authors of all accepted papers must Such submissions violate our dual submission policy and will be removed from submission. while minimizing harm to the individual), risk mitigation, and post-hoc As a multi-disciplinary peer-reviewed content of author rebuttals will be provided when the rebuttal period The authors are careful and transparent about evaluating both the strengths and weaknesses of their work. The submission is clearly written and well organized. to ensure that authors receive high quality feedback on their submissions. May 8-13, 2021 Yokohama, Japan May 8-13, 2021 Online Virtual Conference . That said, if you think the other reviewers are not correct, you are not required to change your mind. Chairs to better anticipate the submission load and to make necessary personal and professional concern, but also a perennial focus of FAccT In such applications, individuals should have the ability to change the decision of the model. Final submissions will be due on January 21, 2022. Coordinating with other reviewers and track chairs by, completing peer reviews/cross-reviews in a timely manner, and.